Kaitlin Sidorsky, Ph.D.

ksidorsky@coastal.edu


Associate Professor

Coastal Carolina University

Year of PhD: 2015

Country: United States (South Carolina)

About Me:

I am an Associate Professor of Political Science at Coastal Carolina University. My research involves the role that gender plays in political ambition, recruitment, and motivations for public service among appointed and elected state officials. My book All Roads Lead to Power: Appointed and Elected Paths to Public Office for US Women (University Press of Kansas 2019) explores the different pathways and ambitions of the men and women who have taken the appointed route to public office in comparison to the electoral route. My current research area with Wendy Schiller (Brown University) studies domestic violence policy in the United States. Our research uses narrative case studies, survey work, and empirical data to present a comprehensive assessment of the politics, policymaking, and implementation surrounding domestic violence in the United States. Our book entitled Inequality Across State Lines: How Policymakers Have Failed Domestic Violence Victims in the United States will be released in 2023 with Cambridge University Press. 

Research Interests

Gender and Politics

State and Local Politics

Public Policy

Public Administration

Bureaucracy

Political Ambition

Political Recruitment

Domestic Violence

Political Appointments

Countries of Interest

United States

Publications:

Journal Articles:

(2022) Federalism, Policy Diffusion, and Gender Equality: Explaining Variation in Domestic Violence Firearm Laws 1990-2017, State Politics & Policy Quarterly

This work explores the ways that federalism exacerbates gender inequality among women by explaining the adoption of domestic violence laws across different states in the context of policy diffusion. Using an original dataset of domestic violence firearm law (DVFL) enactments across all 50 states in the United States from 1990 to 2017, we analyze the circumstances under which states will adopt these laws. Using a set of political and demographic indicators as independent variables, we find evidence that state and federal factors influence policy adoption. In particular, the number of gun-related homicides, partisan control of the legislature, citizen ideology, federal policy, and election years each influence the likelihood of DVFL enactments. We find support for the effects of vertical policy diffusion on initial enactment of federal laws in this domain, but not for reauthorizations, which raises important questions about the continuous influence of the federal government on state policies.

(2020) Litigating Lives and Gender Inequality: Public Defenders, Policy Implementation, and Domestic Violence Sentencing, Journal of Women Politics and Policy

In this article, we show that domestic violence public policies are implemented inconsistently across states under federalism. Using original survey data of public defenders across 16 states, with data on domestic violence laws, we demonstrate that there are differing policies and implementation practices regarding domestic violence cases depending on where they are adjudicated. State level domestic violence laws, such as mandatory arrest and firearm access restrictions, combined with structural elements of the judicial system, and public defender personal characteristics, exert significant influence in determining the outcomes of domestic violence cases. Overall, our analysis shows that the lack of uniformity in the implementation of domestic violence policy creates inequality in the criminal justice system’s treatment of domestic violence and makes personal security for women contingent on where they live.

(2015) Sidorsky, Kaitlin. "Moving on Up? The Gendered Ambitions of State-Level Appointed Officials, Political Research Quarterly

Many scholars have offered explanations as to why women are underrepresented at all levels of government. Conventional wisdom states that fewer women are in public office due to lower ambition, and that the presence of gendered perceptions among women considering elected office contributes to women’s disinterest in the political arena. Using original survey data, this article expands the theory of gendered perceptions to current state-level appointed officeholders to explain their levels of interest in pursuing higher public office. The results indicate that gendered perceptions affect the progressive ambitions of appointees; like studies of ambition in elected officials, this study of appointed officials finds that women are generally less ambitious, and unlike studies of ambition in elected officials, this study of appointed officials finds that women with higher self-assessments are less ambitious rather than more.

Books Written:

(2019) All Roads Lead to Power: The Appointed and Elected Paths to Public Office for US Women, University Press of Kansas

Speaking of cabinet appointments he’d made as governor, presidential candidate Mitt Romney famously spoke of having “whole binders full of women” to consider. The line was much mocked; and yet, Kaitlin Sidorsky suggests, it raises a point long overlooked in discussions of the gender gap in politics: many more women are appointed, rather than elected, to political office. Analyzing an original survey of political appointments at all levels of state government, All Roads Lead to Power offers an expanded, more nuanced view of women in politics. This book also questions the manner in which political ambition, particularly among women, is typically studied and understood. In a deep comparative analysis of appointed and elected state positions, All Roads Lead to Power highlights how the differences between being appointed or elected explain why so many more women serve in appointed offices. These women, Sidorsky finds, are not always victims of a much-cited lack of self-confidence or ambition, or of a biased political sphere. More often, they make a conscious decision to enter politics through what they believe is a far less partisan and negative entry point. Furthermore, Sidorsky’s research reveals that many women end up in political appointments—at all levels—not because they are ambitious to hold public office, but because the work connects with their personal lives or careers. With its groundbreaking research and insights into the ambitions, recruitment, and motivations of appointed officials, Sidorsky’s work broadens our conception of political representation and alters our understanding of how and why women pursue and achieve political power.